08:45 - 09:00 AM: Keynote Address
Keynote Speaker
TBD
Context
Sikkim occupies one of India’s most strategically sensitive Himalayan positions. It borders the Tibet, Bhutan, Nepal and West Bengal in India, while remaining closely linked to the Siliguri Corridor. The state’s security cannot be understood only through the lens of border deployment. Nathu La, Naku La, the Chumbi Valley, the Doklam neighbourhood, high-altitude tourism, Kailash Mansarovar access, fragile roads, climate disasters and local identity all converge in Sikkim. This opening session will frame Sikkim as a compact but decisive frontier state where sovereignty, ecological resilience, infrastructure and community confidence must reinforce one another.
Guiding questions
How does Sikkim’s geography shape India’s China policy, Siliguri Corridor security and Eastern Himalayan strategy?
What are the current strategic concerns around Nathu La, Naku La, the Chumbi Valley and adjoining border areas?
How can border communities, tourism stakeholders and civil administration become active partners in frontier resilience?
What balance is required between military preparedness, ecological sensitivity and protection of Sikkim’s social identity?
Speakers
TBD
Context
Sikkim’s LAC sector has remained strategically significant because of its proximity to the Chumbi Valley, Doklam, Nathu La, Naku La and the eastern Himalayan routes connecting Tibet, Bhutan, Nepal and India. The 2021 Naku La face-off showed that even relatively stable sectors require constant vigilance, infrastructure readiness and calibrated local communication. This session will focus on preparedness without alarmism: surveillance, winter logistics, road access, forward medical support, telecom connectivity, border protocols and coordination between the Army, ITBP, BRO, Sikkim Police and district administration.
Guiding questions
What lessons should be drawn from recent LAC friction in the Sikkim sector?
How can infrastructure, surveillance, winter stocking and communications improve operational preparedness?
What mechanisms can reduce tactical friction while maintaining a firm border posture?
How should military, paramilitary, CAPFs and civil agencies coordinate during border, disaster and tourism-related contingencies?
Speakers
TBD
Context
The 2023 South Lhonak–Teesta disaster transformed climate risk into a direct internal security concern for Sikkim. A glacial lake outburst flood damaged critical infrastructure, affected settlements, disrupted roads, hit hydropower assets and endangered army installations. The disaster revealed the need to treat GLOF risk, dam safety, evacuation planning, bridge redundancy, river monitoring and public warning systems as part of the state’s security architecture. This session will examine the Teesta basin as a climate-security corridor requiring scientific monitoring, local trust and inter-agency preparedness.
Guiding questions
What did the 2023 Teesta disaster reveal about GLOF warning, dam safety and evacuation preparedness?
How should hydropower planning be redesigned for a high-risk Himalayan river system?
What real-time data-sharing mechanism is needed between scientific agencies, dam operators, district administration, Army, ITBP, BRO, NDRF and local communities?
How can rehabilitation, compensation and reconstruction strengthen public trust rather than deepen insecurity?
Speakers
TBD
Context
Sikkim’s connectivity and tourism economy are deeply linked to its internal security, disaster preparedness and frontier resilience. The state’s dependence on limited road arteries, especially NH-10 and North Sikkim routes, makes landslides, bridge damage, road closures and extreme weather a recurring strategic vulnerability. These disruptions affect local livelihoods, tourism, military logistics, medical evacuation and essential supplies. At the same time, high-altitude destinations such as Nathu La, Lachen, Lachung, Yumthang, Gurudongmar and North Sikkim circuits carry serious risks linked to severe weather, altitude sickness, avalanches, landslides and road isolation. Projects such as Sevoke–Rangpo rail, proposed extensions towards Gangtok and Nathu La, alternate road alignments, tunnels, bridge redundancy, permit systems and route advisories must therefore be seen together as part of a wider security and risk-governance framework. This session will examine how Sikkim can strengthen all-weather access, safe tourism, crisis logistics and local livelihood protection without weakening ecological balance.
Guiding questions
How can Sikkim reduce its dependence on vulnerable road arteries while strengthening road, rail, tunnel, bridge and air-connectivity redundancy?
What standards are needed for slope protection, landslide monitoring, tunnel safety, emergency restoration and high-altitude route management?
How can Sikkim balance tourism growth with carrying capacity, weather-gating, permit systems, tourist tracking and local safety protocols?
How can infrastructure development serve local mobility, tourism, military logistics, medical evacuation and disaster response together?
Speakers
TBD
Context
Sikkim’s internal stability rests on its distinctive constitutional history, Article 371F safeguards, multi-ethnic social compact and deep sensitivity around land, identity, representation and belonging. The state’s communities — including Bhutia, Lepcha, Nepali, Limboo, Tamang, Sherpa, Newar, Rai, Gurung, Magar, Sunwar, Sangha institutions and old settler groups — have contributed to a largely peaceful political culture. However, border pressure, migration anxieties, labour inflows, land concerns, digital narratives and identity-based mobilisation can create avoidable friction if not handled with care. This session will focus on lawful protection, inclusive dialogue and social confidence.
Guiding questions
How can Sikkim protect Article 371F safeguards while maintaining social harmony and constitutional confidence?
What are the key anxieties around land, identity, labour movement, old settlers and demographic perception?
How can verification, labour regulation and migration management remain lawful, transparent and non-discriminatory?
What role can civil society, student bodies, monasteries, local leaders and administration play in preventing polarisation?
Speakers
TBD
Context
Sikkim’s internal security rests not only on border preparedness but also on the resilience of its youth, local communities and high-altitude border villages. While the state does not face the same insurgency or narco-trafficking profile as some other North Eastern states, emerging concerns around substance abuse, pharmaceutical misuse, informal courier networks, tourism-linked demand, youth outmigration and limited livelihood pathways require early prevention. At the same time, border villages in North and East Sikkim face remoteness, climate exposure, road disruption, limited medical access, ecological restrictions and seasonal tourism dependence. This session will examine how policing, health services, schools, colleges, civil society, local enterprise, rehabilitation systems and border development schemes can together build a preventive community security framework rooted in dignity, livelihood and trust.
Guiding questions
How can Sikkim prevent youth vulnerability linked to drugs, informal crime, digital influence and limited livelihood opportunities?
What role can schools, colleges, civil society, families, rehabilitation centres and local institutions play in early prevention and recovery?
How can border villages be strengthened through health access, roads, telecom, emergency shelters, tourism, handicrafts, local agriculture and digital services?
What model can retain youth in border areas while strengthening national security, ecological resilience and local livelihoods?
Speakers
TBD
Context
Sikkim’s security environment is shaped by border sensitivity, climate disasters, hydropower concerns, road closures, tourist safety, identity debates, disaster recovery and India-China developments. Rumours during landslides, floods, border tension or infrastructure disruption can affect public confidence, public order and emergency response. At the same time, these challenges cannot be managed through isolated administrative silos. Sikkim requires an integrated Himalayan security framework that connects LAC preparedness, Teesta basin resilience, hydropower safety, road and rail redundancy, tourism risk governance, identity protection, youth prevention, border village development and public communication. This concluding session will focus on responsible communication, inter-agency coordination and a practical 12–24 month roadmap for strengthening sovereignty, ecology, local trust and administrative preparedness.
Guiding questions
How do rumours around border incidents, disasters, tourism, hydropower and identity affect public order and community trust in Sikkim?
What framework is needed for responsible crisis reporting, multilingual advisories, fact-checking and public communication?
How can border security, climate resilience, hydropower governance, tourism safety, youth prevention and connectivity planning be integrated?
What inter-agency mechanism is needed between the Indian Army, ITBP, Sikkim Police, BRO, SSDMA, NDRF, NHIDCL, Indian Railways, tourism authorities, district administration, media and civil society?
Speakers
TBD
16:00 - 16:15: Closing Remarks
Speaker
TBD
16:15 - 17:00: Vote of Thanks
Speaker
TBD
Lt Gen (Retd)
Shokin Chauhan
Former DG
The Assam Rifles
Mr.
Pratikshit Tiwari
Director
Counter Terrorism
CISA
Dr.
Constantino Xavier
Senior Fellow
CSEP
Mr.
Ankit Tewari
Director
Counter Terrorism
CISA
Ambassador (Retd)
Riva Ganguly Das
Former Secretary
MEA
Mr.
Om Prakash
Director
Border Management
CISA
Mr.
Yeshwanth G.
Analyst
Border Management
CISA